A while back (about a month or two) I started getting interested in the Bitcoin phenomenon. This was mainly caused by someone having all his money stolen, which got a lot of publicity.

I read about Bitcoin quite some time back, but now the global economic situation is going mad and a lot of questions are raised about the “trustworthiness of the monitary systems” I started to be curious and decided to have a look.

After a bit of reading, I installed the Bitcoin application. I now had a wallet, and an application to send and receive Bitcoins with. As simple as that.  I’ve added a couple of options to this site, the possibility to donate just in general or donate for the download of my Lotus Notes troubleshooting document. I’m not expecting a lot of activity from those sources because I don’t recieve thousands of visitors a day.

I then started reading about Bitcoin Mining, the process of using CPU or Graphics card GPU to try to produce a valid block (part of the transaction verification process), and as a result ‘mine’ some Bitcoins. I won’t get into detail here, as there is a lot of info on the technical details already. Depending on the hardware available, this is a task worth spending some electricity on or not.

The laptop I tried this on is running a Pentium Core2 Duo on 2.4 GHz. I get a mining rate of approx 5.5 Mhash/s. This results in approximately 1 Bitcoin in about 200 days. If, however you use a PC with a powerful (and compatible) graphics card, you can get mining rates up till 700Mhash/sec, making this one Bitcoin in less then 2 days.  Here’s a hardware comparison chart so you can check how your current hardware will or could perform.

The value of a Bitcoin is decided on several factors, one of the main ones being the amount of money on the market. There are several Exchanges available that will give you the value in a real currency and there are sites that will allow you to cach-in your bitcoins. Because of the growing amount of usage, some sites already accept payments for products directly. Since the hack (if you can call it that) mentioned at the start of this article, the value of the bitcoin has dropped significantly. Before that event, the value of one bitcoin was on approx 17.50$ USD, the days after it dropped to nearly 0 and it is coming back up slowly. The current value of one bitcoin is approx 4.50$ USD.

Taking the mining rates and the current values in mind, it would take me 200 days of a running machine to “generate” 4.50$. This is obviously not a very profitable business. However with the right set-up, using its idle time (when you’re not doing anything), you can actually make quite an “income”. you can calculate how your hardware would perform with this calculator here.

Another way of making money out of the Bitcoin currency is trading on virtual Stock markets. since the price is fluctuating a lot, there is quite some “money” to make for people who trade smart. I did not have a look at that yet as I like this to be a completely free experiment and I don’t feel like buying Bitcoins. A good list of the different stock markets and how they differ and change here.

For now, I’m still mining, even though at a very slow rate. I might start using several machines to mine so the rate multiplies and ideally to one day have a single coin I can do something with :)

To be continued…



Possibly Related:

Technorati Tags: ,

Bits Of Freedom, a Dutch organisation working in favour of Internet freedom and Protection of privacy has started a fundraising action to be able to continue their good work.

One of their main achievements has been the pressure to make the Netherlands the first country to have a Net Neutrality Law.

It is a pity that most of their site is only available in Dutch and since they server their pages over an HTTPS link, this cannot be translated by Google. Some stuff is in English though and I’m sure you’ll get the point.

If you believe the the defense of civil rights online is an important objective, I’d like to direct you to their page where you can make a donation [Link] or scan this QR.



Possibly Related:

Technorati Tags: , ,

  

I have to admit I dozed off for a bit and missed a few presentations… Shame! I did record them and will listen to them soon.

The Organisation of the whole event was great, the ease of participating, and the feedback by Q&A all very informative. There were several intranet sites of different levels, a few of them I already had the “pleasure” of working with:

British American Tobacco. I worked for BAT as a 2nd Line support analyst and also ran a few projects for their support services. That was around the time, new designs where implemented and the intranet started to get the professional look it has now.

Also as a Domino applications developer an intranet site running on Lotus Domino v7 is a real challenge as building web enabled and dynamic applications on that platform is close to Chinese torture. Therefore, I really liked how far they managed to stretch the capabilities.

British Telecom. As one of our customers I had seen some parts of the intranet site, but the complete overview was quite good. I liked their focus on micro-blogging and the use of RSS to push news out. Also their BTpedia knowledge wiki was an impressive demonstration of corporation without too much control in a corporate environment that gives a clear advantage to the business.

Aside from those, I liked the overview of Aviva, the first presented, which had an impressive presence of their forum, which, aside from a set of guidelines was a clearly open interaction between all employees.

The Yammer overview was good and gave us all a lot of arguments to convince company management for the implementation of any social elements to the intranet we work on.

News feeds where also very well demonstrated by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain who had a very nice embedded newsreader that was customised for each employee when joining the organisation. Aside from that the focus was more on the social aspect than on the news.

The social element was the core of the presentation by the National Field team. They demonstrated a site that resembled facebook/Yammer a lot! I believe that this would cause a huge drop in productivity in a business environment, but doe fit the culture and situation very well. The positive side of this is that the adoption by staff is easy as the environment is recognisable.

In the talk about Open Leadership from Charlene Li, one of the phrases that caught my attention was “CEO’s are terrified of losing control… But they don’t have control anyway!” She also gave a lot of arguments for a more social environment where control is loosened and cooperation is made easier.

Google showed lots of slides, and a bit of MOMA, their intranet based mainly (could not be different) based on search. Understandable when you hear about the amount of Data that they manage, but disappointing as most of us where hoping for a look in the kitchen.

Lovemachine and oDesk, both where very aligned to what they believe the intranet should be in the future, I liked that. Social and Open and this way removing any remains of Silos that could be limiting employees’ productivity and creativity.

That’s what I made notes of, I followed quite a few more, but I could not write anymore and eventually dosed off… hopefully the recordings will be online soon and we can have a look at the ones we missed and review the ones that really caught our attention.

General Highlights:

- Everyone was talking about the business need while maintaining:

- Accent on Social media implementations

- Accent on Openness and removing strict control

- In general Intranets are starting to look better and are more adapted to the company image while maintaining functionality and easy adoption.

Some Downsides

  • 24 hours is a Long run!
  • Enormous Sharepoint presence, I feel a bit of fear that Microsoft will soon dominate this market soon too, if not already. A lack of Google to give a compelling presentation did not help. BAT showed quality resistance though with their Lotus Domino based intranet.
  • Would have loved to record sound and image locally. I can imagine that the amount of participation and the value of the event would have dropped though.

Overall this was a great experience which I hope to repeat next year.



Possibly Related:

Technorati Tags: , , ,

A few weeks ago, I wrote an article on how crowdsourcing could be used to bring politics a bit closer to where it should be, the people.

This weekend I found an example that has been built only 3 weeks ago, being used to outline ideas that would/could or at least help to outline the new Moroccan constitution.

The site has been set up by 2 Moroccan IT Students after the Speech of King Mohammed VI, in which he invited the constitutional commission to establish contacts with political parties, trade unions, NGOs and youth organisations to brainstorm about the new constitution.

image

The site is fairly simple and explains well how it works, how its data is checked and validated. It also contains a very nice page with statistics like “Most accepted/rejected proposals” and demographic details on the votes.

The Blog is also definitively worth a read, as well as some the proposals that came through.

http://www.reforme.ma

Some Statistics: (keep in mind this has only be running for 3 weeks in Morocco, where they still have a quite high illiteracy rate and not the greatest internet coverage)

  • Total Votes: 454680
  • Total Comments: 9925
  • Total Proposals: 1471


Possibly Related:

Technorati Tags: ,

Since I wrote the article about the Mexican football team that was managed by its fans, I have not stopped thinking that this way of using the “wisdom of many” should get more and more presence in our lives, and could solve many problems related to the un-representation of our democratic systems.

Crowdsourcing is a bit of a hyped-up term at the moment, but the concept is something I believe is here to stay. According to the Wikipedia, the definition of Crowdsourcing is:

Crowdsourcing is the act of outsourcing tasks, traditionally performed by an employee or contractor, to an undefined, large group of people or community (a "crowd"), through an open call.” (Link).

This, could theoretically speaking be applied to the world of politics in different levels. This way ensuring a slow but steady implementation of the voice of each citizen in the making of political decisions.

In the most simple form I can imagine, people would use the means they already have at hands to vote high-level political decisions. This could be done by Phone, Mobile phone, Internet or even a modern DVB Television.

I am not a political analyst and therefore also quite sure I leave out important details, Neither am I an expert in sociology, meaning I do not know or cannot estimate how people respond to steps in this direction. I’m just sketching here.

 

image In all simplicity, I’d imagine a front-end web based or mobile application where registered citizens (registered in the Census) can have a look at proposals up for voting. Read background information and pro’s and contras. When they have informed themselves, they can vote.

on the other side, the role of the politician would change enormously. A politician would not make the final decision anymore, would have to make sure that the people understand the implications of choices that are presented to them, and best of all, there would be no more less room for influencing from lobbies.

 

Practically there are already quite some platforms out there that would be able to host such an application.

Last Friday I joined the Register webcast about platforms as a service(need to be registered), where they showed a site based on a similar principle: www.lovecleanstreets.org. The concept there is quite simple, and it’s that simple-ness that makes it work and get a lot of people involved.

image This site is aimed at people that post when they find an area like a wall, that is dirty, spray-painted or alike and would like their city-councel to clean. Other platforms that exists for some time already, like DIGG or Reddit implement a similar system aimed prioritizing articles by votes they receive.

A combination of both would already be a tool  that could be used as an indicator with the current political system, showing the politicians the effect their future decisions have on the mass and showing the people what their voted representatives are actually working on. An almost  connection the politicians have lost since a long time now…

 

After all: Politics (from Greek πολιτικός, "of, for, or relating to citizens")

image



Possibly Related:

Technorati Tags: ,

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin